Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal ; 25, 2022.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2204290

ABSTRACT

The landscape of the health sector in South Africa as seen from a regulatory perspective is rapidly changing under the disruptive impact of digitalisation. Drawing on a paradigm of "strong rights" protection, particularly a robust privacy law fit for the digital age and sourced in the nation's Constitution, the operationalisation and application of health privacy regulation in post-apartheid society is briefly described. The note then enumerates and assesses several specific digital health technologies currently in use in interventions in South Africa. To do so, we adopt the international World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of digital health interventions. We also cover the recent South African response to the COVID-19 pandemic, noting the establishment in South Africa of the COVID-19 Tracing Database and subsequent technological interventions aimed at enhancing contact tracing and other responses to the pandemic. The establishment of the initial database was a development at the interface of the law enforcement and health sectors, which raised concerns regarding its risks to privacy, but it also raised hopes regarding its potential rewards in protecting public health. © 2022, North-West Unversity. All rights reserved.

2.
S Afr Med J ; 110(7): 617-620, 2020 06 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-743537

ABSTRACT

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, South Africa (SA) has established a Tracing Database, collecting both aggregated and individualised mobility and locational data on COVID-19 cases and their contacts. There are compelling public health reasons for this development, since the database has the potential to assist with policy formulation and with contact tracing. While potentially demonstrating the rapid facilitation through technology of an important public service, the Tracing Database does, however, infringe immediately upon constitutional rights to privacy and heightens the implications of ethical choices facing medical professionals. The medical community should be aware of this surveillance innovation and the risks and rewards it raises. To deal with some of these risks, including the potential for temporary rights- infringing measures to become permanent, there are significant safeguards designed into the Tracing Database, including a strict duration requirement and reporting to a designated judge. African states including SA should monitor this form of contact tracing closely, and also encourage knowledge-sharing among cross-sectoral interventions such as the Tracing Database in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Confidentiality/ethics , Contact Tracing/ethics , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Databases, Factual/ethics , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , COVID-19 , Contact Tracing/methods , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Developing Countries , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Physician's Role , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Public Health , Risk Assessment , South Africa
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL